Why not? ‘There’s a little bit of Anna in everyone’ She may have been able to carry off the fashion, but her hair was not coiffed to their high standards. In such light, the fewer questions galleries and auction houses ask about the origins of such new money or its bearers, the better.īut some New York women who met “Anna Delvey” found themselves asking one key question. More difficult to answer is how her alleged fraud got as far as it did.įor the past decade or more, the art world has been awash in foreign money, much of it from former Soviet states. Her father, it has been reported, is a truck driver. According to prosecutors, she is from Russia. Sorokin, who has pleaded not guilty, is reportedly interested in seeing her life on the screen.īut who is she? On the surface, that’s easy to answer. Jennifer Lawrence and Margot Robbie have reportedly expressed interest in the lead in a film based on the Vanity Fair story. Shonda Rhimes, the force behind Grey’s Anatomy and Scandal, has announced she is creating a TV series about Sorokin. Not surprisingly, her story has gained the attention of film-makers. It also included names from commercial side of the art world, including designer Daniel Arsham, former Warhol Museum director Eric Shiner, and Sotheby’s vice-president of global digital and marketing strategy Noah Wunsch, who recently sold a collection of Supreme skateboards designed by well-known artists for $1.2m.Īccording to the New York Post, “Anna Delvey” also tried to scam “the ultimate conman” Billy McFarland, who is now jailed in connection with the notorious Fyre festival. Photograph: Matteo Prandoni/BFA/REX/Shutterstock “Her interests and collecting has spanned giants of the modern and contemporary scene,” the brochure read, listing: “Urs Fischer, Cindy Sherman, Agnes Martin, Ed Ruscha, Anish Kapour, and Helmut Newton, to name a few.”Īnna Sorokin celebrates New York fashion week in 2013. Presenting herself as a wealthy art collector from Cologne, she offered agents a suspicious-looking screenshot showing a $20m bank balance.Īt the centre of the alleged scam was a glossy 80-page prospectus aimed at potential investors in the “Anna Delvey Foundation”, which came with names that would make art world insiders, some of whom allegedly became her targets, feel at home. Sorokin is accused of racking up $160,000 in fees at a financial advisory firm in connection with an attempt to rent a Park Avenue property in which she planned to open an arts club. And then she made my $62,000 disappear.” ‘Giants of the modern contemporary scene’ “She walked into my life in Gucci sandals and Céline glasses,” wrote Rachel DeLoache Williams, “and showed me a glamorous, frictionless world of hotel living and Le Coucou dinners and infra-red saunas and Moroccan vacations. She walked into my life in Gucci sandals and Céline glasses Rachel DeLoache Vanity Fair followed up with an account of how the woman invited a friend on a lavish Marrakech holiday, then left her to foot the bill. The name Anna Delvey first became public a year ago, in a New York magazine story titled How Anna Delvey Tricked New York’s Party People. The story of Anna Sorokin, or Anna Delvey, as she presented herself to the highest echelons of the art world, is about a young woman accused of using a sheen of sophistication to perpetrate a two-year, $275,000 scam of friends, banks, private jet companies, designers and upscale hotels. The obsession with presentation is oddly appropriate. ( GQ reported she had hired a stylist.) For much of the last week, Sorokin’s wardrobe has been informing hearings that have given New York light entertainment between the El Chapo case and the start in June of the Harvey Weinstein sexual assault trial.Īnna Sorokin in New York state supreme court on 27 March. It wasn’t the Miu Miu she wore on Tuesday, or Thursday’s Saint Laurent. She was wearing a white shirt and black trousers. An hour later, the defendant was brought in. Kiesel directed court officers to give Sorokin coffee or water and ordered a break. She’s not being treated well by other inmates and some officers …” It was true, he said, that the 28-year-old dubbed the “socialite scammer” by the New York tabloids “didn’t want appear in Rikers clothes and her clothes were dirty and not pressed”.īut, he said, it was “an aggregate of things, not just her clothes. Are you asking me to stop this trial because of her wardrobe?” I’m sorry, her clothing is not up to her standards. “This is a trial,” Kiesel told Sorokin’s lawyer, Todd Spodek.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |